Table 2. Structure of Meaning Units on Periodontal Disease Treatment Experiences of Clinical Korean Medicine Doctors

Theme Central Meaning Unit Sub-Meaning Unit Description
Patterns of Patients’ Experiences with Periodontal Disease Route of visiting Korean medicine clinics Non-primary complaints or Accompanied symptoms
Identified among long-term care patients
Residual symptoms after dental treatment
Frequency of visits by periodontal disease patients Patient-related factors
Structural factors orKorean medicine doctor–related factors
Chief complaints Pain (gingival pain, tooth pain, etc.)
Gingival symptoms (swelling, bleeding, discharge, etc.)
Dental symptoms (mobility, sensitivity, fractures, etc.)
Oral symptoms (halitosis, dryness, tongue symptoms, etc.)
Evaluation and Diagnosis by Korean Medicine Doctors Factors considered when evaluating periodontal disease patients Visual inspection (redness, swelling, pus discharge, etc.)
Patients’ subjective symptoms (pain, heatness, etc.)
Presence of systemic diseases and lifestyle
Assessment based on dental records
Other considerations (general condition, presence of cognitive impairment, etc.)
Korean medicine interpretation of periodontal disease Assessment based on symptom severity
Distinction between pain, swelling, and inflammatory stage
Basic recognition of inflammation, with variations in detailed interpretation
Pattern identification based on Sasang constitutional medicine
Differentiation between gingivitis and periodontitis in disease progression
Experiences with Korean Medicine Treatment for Periodontal Disease Types and methods of Korean medicine treatment Acupuncture
Herbal medicine
Pharmacopuncture
Lifestyle education
Other treatments
Experience of treatment effects Cases with perceived treatment effectiveness
Cases without perceived effectiveness and reasons
Difficulties in the Treatment Process (Clinical Barriers) Structural factors Limitations of the Korean medicine clinical scope
Limitations of the clinical environment for Korean medicine treatment
Lack of institutional systems supporting periodontal disease treatment
Korean medicine doctor–related factors Lack of education on periodontal disease during Korean medicine training
Insufficient awareness of periodontal disease treatment and low confidence
Lack of sharing and transmission of clinical experience
Patient-related factors Treatment discontinuation during the course of care
Lack of awareness of Korean medicine treatment for periodontal disease
Lack of continuity in periodontal disease management
Difficulties in patient education and management
Dental–Korean Medicine Collaboration Reasons collaboration was successful dentistry was available within the same institution.
Reasons collaboration was difficult Mismatch in treatment goals and direction between dentistry and Korean medicine
Patients’ lack of awareness/understanding regarding the need for collaborative care
Insufficient mutual understanding and recognition of the need for collaboration between dentistry and Korean medicine
Lack of a collaboration system
Future Needs and Directions Need for clinical guidelines and manuals for Korean medicine treatment of periodontal disease Need for manuals to supplement limitations of periodontal disease treatment
Need for manuals defining the role of Korean medicine doctors in adjunctive periodontal care
Need for guidelines tailored to clinical settings
Complementary points for Dental–Korean medicine collaboration Need for manuals to facilitate collaboration
Need to establish criteria for evaluating treatment effects
Need to improve mutual understanding and role recognition between professional fields
Future role of Korean medicine doctors in periodontal disease treatment Role as providers of adjunctive and supportive care alongside dental treatment
Role as screeners in elderly-centered primary care settings
Need for changes in awareness and increased interest in periodontal disease treatment
Need for accumulation and sharing of clinical experience, research, and evidence