| Positive Responses to CBT | Convenience of media presentation (high-resolution images, video zoom functionality, etc.) | 8 |
| Convenience of multiple-choice answer selection and error indication functions | 2 |
| Perceived as enjoyable and less tense, similar to a quiz | 2 |
| Novel format and well-suited to subject characteristics (e.g., dermatology, surgery) | 3 |
| Technical Issues | Slow tablet response | 1 |
| Presence of items with broken choice formats | 1 |
| Requests for Operational and System Function Improvements | Need for immediate result confirmation | 1 |
| Advantage of being able to display incorrect answers before submission; however, review process is hindered | 1 |
| Mention of potential for keyboard input for essay-type questions (noting discomfort with typing on current devices) | 2 |
| UI/UX-related Discomfort | Inconvenience of scrolling to re-check images | 1 |
| Inconvenience in navigating forward/backward during the test (especially in 1:1 matching image questions) | 1 |
| Requests for Test Environment Improvements | Need for more spacious seating arrangements | 1 |
| Comparison with Traditional Methods | CBT offers improvements such as high resolution and repeated review capability | 3 |
| Other Suggestions and Comments | Although the format is new, adaptation is possible with familiarity | 1 |