| Group | Sample size/percentage (%) | Evaluation Method | Main outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|
| MTS | 25/26.3 | KAGS gradeQGASC grade | KAGS grade were significantly decreased after the treatment (p<0.001)QGASC grade were significantly decreased after the treatment (p<0.001) |
| Subscision | 27/28.4 | KAGS gradeQGASC grade | KAGS grade were significantly decreased after the treatment (p<0.001)QGASC grade were significantly decreased after the treatment (p<0.05) |
| Subcision, MTS | 20/21.1 | KAGS gradeQGASC grade | KAGS grade were significantly decreased after the treatment (p<0.001)QGASC grade were significantly decreased after the treatment (p<0.001) |
| Subcision, Pharmacoacupucnture | 23/24.2 | KAGS gradeQGASC grade | KAGS grade were significantly decreased after the treatment (p<0.001)QGASC grade were significantly decreased after the treatment (p<0.001) |